| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
CATEGORIES
RECENT ENTRIES
- All’s fair in love and gore
- Style guide
- Phoenix Pix: March 15-19, 2010
- Lines of duty
- The Great American University (guess who?)
BLOG ROLL
- A Day in the Life
- Becker-Posner Blog
- Career Advising & Planning Services
- Chicago Studies: The Blog that Works
- Humanities News Blog
- Law School Faculty Blog
- Library Special Collections Research Center
- Maroon News blog
- Science Life
- The Theater Blog
- Uncommon Application Blog
- University Press Chicago
- More UChicago blogs
Bear in mind the benefits
|
|
|
|
In the Law School’s packed lecture-room II Tuesday evening, Law Professor Douglas Lichtman pondered drug patents, Dunkin Donuts, a Gone with the Wind parody, and pet bears. He was presenting the 18th annual Coase Lecture, a public series established in honor of Nobel Prize winner and Clifton R. Musser professor emeritus of economics Ronald Coase, using such examples to illustrate that courts, when dictating litigants’ behavior before or during trial, should consider not only potential unjust and irreparable costs but also possible undeserved, irrevocable benefits. In the case of the bear, for example, Lichtman argued that if a court examined nonmonetary harms, such as a neighbor forced to live in fear of mauling, it should also take into account goods, such as the owner’s quality time with his or her ursine companion. As far as Lichtman is concerned, however, “the bear goes.”
A.L.M.
Photo: Douglas Lichtman gives the Law School’s annual Coase Lecture (top). Afterward Lichtman chats with Ronald Coase, the lecture series’ namesake (bottom).
January 28, 2004
Post a comment