University of Chicago Magazine's Web log, updated Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays by 3 p.m.

« Small feasts | Main | Anna Karenina, expatriate »

November 14, 2005

Homegrown laws

Gonzales_thumb.jpg

Scanning the audience, a security guard’s gaze fell on the back of the Law School’s Glen A. Lloyd auditorium. The guard bounded up the aisle and approached a student in the audience. “Sir, your laptop,” the guard commanded, gesturing outside. The student reluctantly toted his laptop into the hall, where government agents had directed the rest of the audience to leave their belongings before U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ November 9 talk.

His physical security ensured by the horde of guards in the theater, the attorney general had more lofty concerns to ponder. Gonzales told the packed audience that he fears a “growing tendency” among some Supreme Court justices to cite foreign law in their decisions.

Referring to foreign law presents two primary problems, Gonzales asserted, reading closely from a prepared text. First, there is the “problem of selection.” By picking and choosing which foreign laws to consider, the court, Gonzales said, “can be seen as looking over the heads of the crowd and picking out its friends.” The other issue, he said, is undermining the court’s legitimacy and “our sacred text, the Constitution,” by referring to other countries’ precedent instead of America’s.

Although “we must be open to good new ideas whatever their source,” he urged that these ideas be expressed through the political process and not through the courts. Questioning how the “standards of anyone other than the citizens of the United States could decide the will of the people,” Gonzales insisted that his statements must not be “mistaken as isolationism.”

Meredith Meyer, ’06

Photo: Law School Dean Saul Levmore introduces Gonzales.

Posted by abraverman at November 14, 2005

Comments

The law of every other country in Western Europe defines torture as "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment" while in the US we are proud to define it as "physical pain amounting to… the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death."

Foreign laws not only thwart the will of the American people as represented by the Bush Administration, but, as this example shows, they can be vague, lenient, and ineffective.

I sleep better at night knowing that men like General Gonzalez are defending our sacred Constitution.

Posted by: Homayun Zadeh AB77 at November 16, 2005 12:32 AM

My first impulse is inexpressible rage that University of Chicago would give a platform to such an immoral creature as Alberto Gonzalez. But I think the bitter sarcasm of the previous commentator is the healthier reaction. In either case I hope the Law School takes note.
Frederick Wasser
AB 75

Posted by: Frederick Wasser at November 16, 2005 4:11 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?